Interfaith Dialogue Format in Fostering Peace on Instagram: Indonesia Celebrates Diversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9744/joce.3.1.34-53Keywords:
Peace, Indonesia Celebrates Differences, Cognitive, Dialogue Formats, TogethernessAbstract
This research aims to examine the peace dialogue format in fostering harmony on Instagram Indonesia Merayakan Perbedaan (IMP). This research uses descriptive quantitative research, where this study aims to examine the use of dialogue formats in fostering harmony on the Instagram social media platform IMP. The researcher found three indicators used in the study, namely cognitive, affective, and collaborative. In each indicator, there are themes raised by the researchers to classify each post. The most frequently appearing theme in the cognitive indicator is the theme of knowledge of differences and similarities. The most frequently appearing affective theme is the theme of togetherness. The most prominent collaborative theme is the theme of collaboration in building the nation. The result of this research is that, in building peace on Instagram IMP, the cognitive indicator is the most widely used indicator. In conclusion, the cognitive aspect is useful for building a dialogue of harmony among religious communities and cultures in Indonesia, especially on the theme of understanding differences and similarities.
References
Abiddin, N., Ibrahim, I., & Aziz, S. (2022). Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and Their Part towards Sustainable Community Development. Sustainability.
Abu-Nimer, M., & Renáta Katalin Nelson. (2021). Evaluating Interreligious Peacebuilding and Dialogue. Walter De Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Abu-Nimer, M., & Nelson, R. K. (2021). Evaluating interreligious peacebuilding and dialogue : Methods and frameworks. De Gruyter.
Akah, J. N., & Ajah, A. C. (2022). Interreligious dialogue as a myth. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7706
Bambang, otto. (2018). Company profile indonesia merayakan perbedaan. Perkumpulan Indonesia Merayakan Perbedaan.
Bourne, C. (2019). AI cheerleaders: Public relations, neoliberalism and artificial intelligence. Public Relations Inquiry, 8, 109 - 125.
Broom, G. M., & Cutlip, S. M. (2009). Cutlip & center’s effective public relations. Prentice Hall.
Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience. World Development, 22, 1253-1268.
Cho, M., Schweickart, T., & Haase, A. (2014). Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 40, 565-567.
Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2006). Effective Public Relations. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Duhalm, S. (2010). The role and importance of public relations at non-governmental organizations. STUDIES and SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES. ECONOMICS EDITION, 15.
Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis isi : Pengantar metodologi untuk penelitian ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu-ilmu sosial lainnya. Kencana.
Goette, L., & Huffman, D. (2007). Affect and the motivational foundations of social capital. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.142
Greenberg, J., Knight, G., & Westersund, E. (2011). Spinning climate change: Corporate and NGO public relations strategies in Canada and the United States. International Communication Gazette, 73, 65 - 82.
Hallahan, K. (2000). Enhancing motivation, ability, and opportunity to process public relations messages. Public Relations Review, 26, 463-480.
Hendershot, A., Loewen, L., Marsh, C., Guth, D. W., & Bonnie Poovey Short. (2024). Strategic writing. Taylor & Francis.
Huebsch, J. (1986). Examples of correspondence. Communication, 230-290.
Jagosh, J., Macaulay, A., Pluye, P., Salsberg, J., Bush, P., Henderson, J., Sirett, E., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Herbert, C., Seifer, S., Green, L., & Greenhalgh, T. (2012). Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 90, 311 - 346.
Kim, M., & Cappella, J. (2019). Reliable, valid and efficient evaluation of media messages. Journal of Communication Management.
Ledingham, J., & Bruning, S. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55-65.
Liebschner, A. (2019). Pragmatic Relations in the Communication of Public Groups in the Russian Social Network Vkontakte. Slavonica, 24, 52 - 72.
Lindsay, J. (2021). Meaningful interpersonal contact: Interreligious dialogue as a response to the cognitive and social dynamics of bias. 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73053-6_11
Marek, M. (2005). Applying constructivism to improve public relations for education.
Marsh, C., Guth, D. W., & Bonnie Poovey Short. (2017). Strategic writing. Routledge.
Morris, T., & Goldsworthy, S. (2008). PR in the not-for-profit sector.
Mukhametzyanova, L. (2021). Cognitive dialogue as a factor of enhancing the quality of education in the conditions of international cooperation in the sphere of higher education. SHS Web of Conferences, 99, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219901009
Myers, C. (2016). What’s the legal definition of PR?: An analysis of commercial speech and public relations. Public Relations Review, 42, 821-831.
Ormel, I., Salsberg, J., Hunt, M., Doucet, A., Hinton, L., Macaulay, A., & Law, S. (2020). Key issues for participatory research in the design and implementation of humanitarian assistance: a scoping review. Global Health Action, 13.
Öze, N. (2017). DIALECTIC BETWEEN SOCIAL MEDIA WHICH BECAME SOCIETAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC RELATION WHICH IS A STRATEGIC MARKETING COMMUNICATION TOOL. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7, 203-212.
Ronaldo, R., & Darmaiza, D. (2021). Politisasi agama dan politik kebencian pada pemilu presiden indonesia 2019. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 3(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v3i1.150
Ruslan, R. (2005). Manajeman public relations dan media komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Salsabila, J., Juliadrianti, M., Luqyana, K., Kadri, H. A., & Setiawati, M. (2024). Urgensi komunikasi efektif dalam public relations. Jurnal Common, 7(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.34010/common.v7i2.11492
Sereda, A. (2018). Cognitive-discourse approach as a methodology for the analysis of intercultural communication. The Journal of v. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series “the Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science,” 58. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2018-58-08
Smith, R. (2020). Strategic Planning for Public Relations.
Tombolato, M. (2023). From information to knowledge.the role of public communication of science in educating epistemically responsible citizens. MeTis - Mondi Educativi Temi Indagini Suggestioni, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.30557/mt00275
Treadwell, D., & Treadwell, J. (1999). Public Relations Writing: Principles in Practice.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edward Hiroshi Tandawidjaja, Inri Inggrit Indrayani, Astri Yogatama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
